PENGARUH GAYA BELAJAR VISUAL TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X PADA MATA PELAJARAN FIQIH DI MADRASAH ALIYAH NEGERI TANJUNGPINANG
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to answer 3 problems, namely: (1) How is the visual learning style of class X students in Fiqh subjects at Madrasah Aliyah Tanjungpinang State; (2) How are the learning outcomes of class X students in fiqh subjects at Madrasah Aliyah, Tanjung Pinang; (3) Is there any effect of students' visual learning styles on student learning outcomes in fiqh subjects at Madrasah Aliyah, Tanjung Pinang.
This study aims to (1) determine the visual learning style of class X students in fiqh subjects at Madrasah Aliyah Tanjungpinang State; (2) Knowing the learning outcomes of class X students in fiqh subjects at Madrasah Aliyah Tanjungpinang State; (3) Knowing the effect of students' visual learning styles on Fiqh subjects on the learning outcomes of class X students at Madrasah Aliyah Tanjungpinang State. In this study, the technique used by researchers in collecting data is using questionnaires, interviews, documentation and observation.
The conclusion of this research is that the students' visual learning style reaches 85.6%. This is evident from the results of the questionnaire data on variable X which is in the range of 81% - 100% categorized as Very Good. Student learning outcomes reached 82.3%. This is evident from the results of the Y variable questionnaire data which is in the range of 81% - 100% categorized as Very Good. The Pearson correlation number is **0.468, which means that the correlation between students' visual learning style variables and student learning outcomes is 0.468. The Pearson correlation value is 0.468, so it can be concluded that the degree of relationship between the Pearson correlation values is at 0.40 – 0.70, which means that the X and Y variables are sufficiently correlated. Then the relationship between variables X and Y is positively related. This means that 46.8% of student learning outcomes are influenced by variable (X), while the remaining 53.2% is influenced by other variables not examined in this study.
References
Bahri, Syamsul dan Fahkry Zamzam. (2015). Model Penelitian Kuantitatif Berbasis Semamos.Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Deporter, Bobby dan Mike Hernacki. (2000). Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Jakarta: Quantum Learning.
Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Direktorat Pendidikan Islam dan Departemen Agama.(2006). Undang-Undang dan Peraturan Pemerintah tentang Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Ghufron, M. Nur dan Rini Risnawati S. (2014). Gaya Belajar Kajian Teoritik. Yogyakarata:Pustaka Pelajar.
Hamalik, Oemar. (2007). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Aksara.
Nasution. (2011). Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Nawawi, Hadari. (1989). Organisasi Sekolah dan Pengelolaan Kelas.Jakarta: PT. Haji Mas Agung.
Priyatno, Dwi. (2010). Paham Analisa Statistik Data Dengan SPSS: Plus Tata Cara dan Tips Menyusun Skripsi dalam Waktu Singkat. Yogyakarta: Mediakom.
Priyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Surabaya: Zifatama Publishing.
Setiawan, Firman. (2019). Buku Ajar Studi Fiqih. Bangkes: Duta Media Publishing.
Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Subini, Nini. (2015). Rahasia Gaya Belajar Orang Besar. Yogyakarta: Javalitera.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suprayekti. (2003). Interaksi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan Dirjen Dikdasmen, Depdiknas.
Susanto, Ahmad. (2013). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sutikno, M.Sobry. (2013). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Lombok: Holistika.
Syah, Muhibbin. (2002). Psikolgi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Thobroni, M. (2015). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: Ar- Ruzz Media.
Wahyono, Teguh. (2006). 36 Jam Belajar Komputer Analisis Data Statistik dengan SPSS. Jakarta: Gramedia.
